Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 130 Cal. App. 421 - Potapoff v. Mattes

130 Cal. App. 421 - Potapoff v. Mattes’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
March 1976
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 1976

16 state decisions

6019331940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The number of attorneys who may address the jury on either side is within the discretion of the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.