Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 130 Cal. App. 708 - People v. La Vers

130 Cal. App. 708 - People v. La Vers’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
November 1984
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 1984

15 state decisions

80193319401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Kauffman · People v. Lawrence · People v. Vasquez · People v. Bringhurst · People v. Argentos

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Without discussing any other points raised by the contention, the testimony was `admissible as tending to show a motive on the part of the defendants for the homicide of the two policemen. It explained why the defendants were so anxious to prevent arrest ... knowing that they were all guilty of the crime of robbery, it is easy to understand why they might take life before they would suffer themselves to be arrested, their crime found out, and the severe punishment meted out to them which the law affixes to the crime of robbery. [Citations.]'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.