People v. Martinez’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
September 1966
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 39 Cal. 2d 336 - People v. McCracken · 42 Cal. 2d 816 - Gross v. Superior Court · 27 Cal. 2d 649 - People v. Barnett · People v. Haley · People v. Neal
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It appears from the order here entered that the motion of the appellant, as made, for a hearing under the sections here involved, was unqualifiedly granted and that it was ordered that he be returned for such hearing ' upon order. ’ Apparently defendant was not present and no witnesses were sworn or examined, and petitioner had no counsel representing him at such hearing, if there was one. Therefore, the order of the court recommitting him has no evidentiary support other than the diagnosis and recommendation of the hospital staff. ‘ ‘ Section 5519, supra, provides that when such a hearing has been ordered that it shall be conducted substantially in accordance with sections 5504 and 5511, inclusive, . . .” (Italics added in part.) (Cf. also, People v. Gross, supra, 139 Cal.App.2d 607, 609 ; People v. Gross, 115 Cal.App.2d 502, 504 [ 252 P.2d 416 ].)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.