Flores v. Barman’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

cited by 41 later decisions

states following

August 2008

most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently August 2008 · most notably 12 Cal. 3d 608 - Fire Fighters Union, Local 1186 v. City of Vallejo (1974), Cable Connection, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc. (2008)

3 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act)

Relies on Libby, McNeill & Libby v. Alaska Industrial Board · Dipson Theatres, Inc. v. Buffalo Theatres, Inc. · Western Coal & Mining Co. v. Jones · Crofoot v. Blair Holdings Corp. · Boeing Airplane Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“It now is settled that `in the absence of some limiting clause in the arbitration agreement, the merits of the award, either on questions of fact or of law, may not be reviewed except as provided in the statute' (Crofoot v. Blair Holdings Corp., 119 Cal.App.2d 156, 186, 260 P. 2d 156, 172; Sapp v. Barenfeld, 34 Cal. 2d 515, 523, 212 P.2d 233; Pacific Vegetable Oil Corp. v. C. S. T., Ltd., 29 Cal. 2d 228, 235, 238, 174 P.2d 441; Flores v. Barman, 130 Cal.App.2d 282, 286, 279 P.2d 81; In re Frick, 130 Cal.App. 290, 292, 19 P.2d 836).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Cable Connection, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc. · Raytheon Co. v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.