Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 130 CALAPP2D 672 - Sumner v. Flowers

Sumner v. Flowers’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
4
states following
May 2010
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 2010

20 state decisions

601955196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Estate of Bristol v. Young · Ford v. John S. · Geary Street, Park & Ocean Railroad v. Rolph · Ferguson v. McBean · Pacific Ready-Cut Homes, Inc. v. Seeber

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The contract of the agent is the contract of the principal, and he may sue or be sued thereon, though not named therein; and notwithstanding the rule of law that an agreement reduced to writing may not be contradicted or varied by parol, it is well settled that the principal may show that the agent who made the contract in his own name was acting for him. This proof does not contradict the writing; it only explains the transaction."”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.