In re Adams’s Empirical Analysis
130 F. 381 · 1904
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
February 1915
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on In re Stern · In re Coburn · In re Bingham · In re Burka · In re Garlington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““But a creditor cannot prove for an indebtedness arising between the filing of the involuntary petition and adjudication. This appears from the analogy of section 63a (1), (2), (3), and (5), as applied to the interpretation of clause (4). In clauses (1) and (4), for example, the limit of time must be the same, inasmuch as clause (4) includes clause (1), and, if clause (4) were less limited in point of time, the limit imposed upon clause (1) would become nugatory.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Roth & Appel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.