Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 130 F.1d 905 - Wright v. Stewart

Wright v. Stewart’s Empirical Analysis

130 F. 905 · 1904

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 1982
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1982

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

40190419101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thomas Wood Junior v. United States · Spies v. People · Branch v. Faust · John Catts v. James Phalen · Archer v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The trend of modern jurisprudence is to get away from the technical or literal application of ancient maxims of the law intended to prevent fraud by refusing audience to a party who in his complaint discloses that he himself is tainted with moral turpitude, when its application in the particular case would prove but a cover and shelter for the scoundrel who by falsehood and deceit inveigled the complainant to trust him with his money. In other words, where the ends of public policy will rather be promoted by giving than refusing relief, courts prefer the former. In short, although the complainant may in some degree be in delicto, yet, unless he is also in pari delicto with the defendant, it does not, and should not, follow that the doors of the temple of justice should be closed against him."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.