Dimenza v. Johnston’s Empirical Analysis
130 F.2d 465 · 1942
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently October 1979 · most notably Ekberg v. United States (1948), Williams v. State (1979)
28 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hewitt v. United States · United States v. Noveck · Wells v. United States · Schultz v. Zerbst · Durrett v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(a) Whoever, by force and violence, or by putting in fear, feloniously takes, or feloniously attempts to take, from the person or presence of another any property or money or any other thing of value belonging to, or in the care, custody, control, management, or possession of, any bank, 2 * * * shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both; * * *. “(b) Whoever, in committing, or in attempting to commit, any offense defined in subsection (a) of this section, assaults any person, or puts in jeopardy the life of any person by the use of a dangerous weapon or device, shall be fined not less than $1,000 nor more than $10,000 or imprisoned not less than five years nor more than twenty-five years, or both.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““The test in determining whether more than one offense is charged in an indictment or denounced by statute is whether or not each supposed offense requires proof of some fact which the others do not.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Graham v. Squier
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.