Paradis v. Arave’s Empirical Analysis
130 F.3d 385 · 1997
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Bean v. Calderon (1998), United States of America v. Pantelis Antonakeas (2001)
27 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Wainwright v. Sykes · Townsend v. Sain
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the evidence was exculpatory or impeaching; (2) it should have been, but was not produced; and (3) the suppressed evidence was material to his guilt or punishment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Federal habeas corpus relief is limited to claims that allege a constitutional violation in the state criminal proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jirovec v. Wood
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.