Bavaro v. Pataki’s Empirical Analysis
130 F.3d 46 · 1997
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2013
9 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Elrod v. Burns · Branti v. Finkel · Bennis v. Gable
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[P]olitical affiliation is an appropriate [job] requirement where there is a rational connection between shared ideology and job performance,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“) weighs against First Amendment protection for Associate Counsels, who oversee Assistant Counsels and Senior Attorneys, but in favor of protection for Assistant Counsels, who apparently have no supervisory responsibilities over other attorneys. Finally, although Associate and Assistant Counsels are not empowered to speak directly on behalf of an elected official, they represent the State in proceedings before the Board, and must therefore reflect the views of policymakers in their dealings with the Board and with the physicians whom they prosecute. These factors, of course, are not”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bavaro v. Pataki“). See N.Y. Pub. Health Law § 230 (McKinney Supp.1997). Grounds for misconduct charges range from gross negligence and incompetence to harassment, sexual abuse, race discrimination and drug or alcohol abuse. See N.Y. Educ. Law § 6530 (McKinney Supp.1997). The chain of events leading to a disciplinary proceeding before the Board begins with an investigation by the Office of Medical Misconduct (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bavaro v. Pataki
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.