Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 130 F.3d 595 - Plath v. Moore

Plath v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

130 F.3d 595 · 1997

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
December 2021
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 2021

5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

901997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Townsend v. Sain · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Darden v. Wainwright · Yates v. Evatt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a general rule, ... been applied in the vast majority of cases,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “make an exhaustive examination of [the defendant's] background and mental state”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.