Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 130 F.3d 614 - Beall v. Abbott Laboratories

Beall v. Abbott Laboratories’s Empirical Analysis

130 F.3d 614 · 1997

Citation profile

142
cited by 142 later decisions
1
states following
December 2021
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 40 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 142 later decisions — most recently December 2021 · most notably Smith v. First Union National Bank (2000), Laber v. Harvey (2006)

20 federal appellate · 40 district · 1 state decisions

10801997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks · Sobin v. United States · Evans v. Technologies Applications & Service Co. · Dale v. Chicago Tribune Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 142 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “both that the reason was false and that discrimination was the real reason for the challenged conduct.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) the plaintiff engaged ih a protected activity, such as filing a complaint with the EEOC; (2) the employer acted adversely against the plaintiff; and (3) the protected activity was causally connected to the employer’s adverse action.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “to rebut the presumption of retaliation by articulating a legitimate nonretaliatory reason for its actions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.