Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 130 F.3d 657 - Askanase v. Fatjo

Askanase v. Fatjo’s Empirical Analysis

130 F.3d 657 · 1997

Citation profile

110
cited by 110 later decisions
7
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 5 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 110 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably Browning Manufacturing v. Mims (In Re Coastal Plains, Inc.) (1999), Official Committee of the Unsecureds of Color Tile Inc v. Coopers & Lybrand Llp Sa Abf Ec W J E III F Aibc Bv Cip

34 federal appellate · 5 district · 7 state decisions

5401997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pullman-Standard v. Swint · Herman & MacLean v. Huddleston · Cities of Charlottesville v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. · Little v. Liquid Air Corp. · Edgar v. Mite Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 110 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the needs of the interstate and international systems; (2) the relevant policies of the forum; (3) the relevant policies of other interested states and the relative interests of those states; (4) the protection of justified expectations; (5) the basic policies underlying the particular field of law; (6) certainty, predictability and uniformity of result; (7) ease in the determination and application of the law to be applied.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[I]t must be posited as an a priori assumption [that] there is one, but only one, legal answer for every cognizable dispute. There being only one applicable legal rule for each dispute or issue, it requires only one spokesman of the law, who of course is the judge.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “`each party would find an expert who would state the law in the light most favorable to its position.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.