Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 130 F.3d 722 - Bloom v. Bexar County

Bloom v. Bexar County’s Empirical Analysis

130 F.3d 722 · 1997

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Weyer v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. (2000), Disabled Rights Action Committee v. Las Vegas Events, Inc. (2004)

8 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

230199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Associated Grocers, Inc. v. Washington · Mansell v. Mansell · Thomas v. United States · Salsbury Industries v. United States · Brown v. 1250 Twenty-Fourth Street Associates Ltd. Partnership

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Title III of the ADA applies to private entities providing public accommodations, . . . not to public entities. Entities subject to Title III include private schools, but not public ones.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “public accommodation' as certain `private entities,' and includes a list of the types of private entities included with that definition. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the extent of the employer's right to control the `means and manner' of the worker's performance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.