Burris v. Parke’s Empirical Analysis
130 F.3d 782 · 1997
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably Wright v. Angelone (1998), Robert Rodriguez v. Robert Mitchell (2001)
26 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Felker v. Turpin · Zipfel v. Halliburton Co. · Thompson v. Calderon · Felker v. Turpin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a prisoner's motion to recall the mandate on the basis of the merits of the underlying decision can be regarded as a second or successive application for purposes of sec.2244(b). Otherwise, petitioners could evade the bar against relitigation of claims presented in a prior application, sec.2244(b)(1), or the bar against litigation of claims not presented in a prior application, sec.2244(b)(2). If the court grants such a motion, its action is subject to [the] AEDPA”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“may not be impressed with the idea that to know the cause of viciousness is to excuse it; they may conclude instead that when violent behavior appears to be outside the defendant's power of control, capital punishment is appropriate to incapacitate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] claim presented in a second or successive habeas corpus application under section 2254 that was presented in a prior application shall be dismissed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.