Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 130 F.3d 833 - McDowell v. Calderon

McDowell v. Calderon’s Empirical Analysis

130 F.3d 833 · 1997

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
3
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably United States v. Frega (1999), Beardslee v. Woodford (2003)

32 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions

3201997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Gregg v. Georgia · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Teague v. Lane · Estelle v. McGuire

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “continues until a verdict is reached and returned. As they work towards a verdict, the jurors must stay in the channel charted for them by state law. To this end, they may need ongoing guidance.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “any sympathetic or other aspect of the defendant's character or record [that the defendant offers] as a basis for a sentence less than death, whether or not related to the offense for which he is on trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.