Naas v. Stolman’s Empirical Analysis
130 F.3d 892 · 1997
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably Johnson v. Riddle (2002), Glover v. Federal Deposit Insurance (2012)
10 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1692K (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367
Relies on Cantu v. Resolution Trust Corp. · Mattson v. U.S. West Communications, Inc. · Torres v. City of Santa Ana · Maloy v. Phillips
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the court held that the violation occurred and the statute of limitations started to run on either the day the complaint was filed or the day it was served, but deciding between the two alternatives was unnecessary in that case.” Id. (citing Prade v. Jackson & Kelly, 941 F.Supp. 596 , 600 (N.D.W.Va.1996)) (emphasis added). In the other, the court was”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.