Townsend v. Chavis

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided March 16, 2005

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2005-03-16

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 2019

1 district ·

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2005-03-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Andre P. Townsend appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge in part and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Townsend v. Chavis, No. CA-02-4060 (D.S.C. Apr. 15 & Sept. 8, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED