Cabell v. Rousseau’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 111 (Federal Judiciary Protection Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 3109
Relies on County of Sacramento v. Lewis · California v. Hodari D. · Wilson v. Arkansas · Richards v. Wisconsin · Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“did not submit to their authority until the firing had ceased”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.