Murphy v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 111 (Goldwater-Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1986) · 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 31 U.S.C. § 3702 · 5 U.S.C. § 5922 · 5 U.S.C. § 5923 · 5 U.S.C. § 7512
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Haines v. Kerner · United States v. Testan · Auer v. Robbins · Office of Personnel Management v. Richmond
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[This volume] establishes [Department of Defense] policy, delegates authority, assigns responsibilities, and authorizes the payment of allowances and differentials to [Department of Defense] appropriated fund civilian employees who are 'U.S. citizens living in foreign areas pursuant to the [DSSR] and [Sections 5622, 5584, and 5922 of [T]itle 5, United States Code....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.