Yniguez v. Mofford’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2403
Relies on Warth v. Seldin · Baker v. Carr · Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission · Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of Bellwood · Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the War
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to which [the] State or any agency, officer, or employee thereof is not a party.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Maria-Kelly F. Yniguez Jaime P. Gutierrez v. State of Arizona, Robert D. Parks Arizonans for Official English, Applicants in Intervention-Appellants. Maria-Kelly F. Yniguez Jaime P. Gutierrez v. Rose Mofford, Individually and as Governor of the State of Arizona Robert Corbin, Individually and as Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Robert D. Parks Arizonans for Official English, Applicants in Intervention-Appellees · Yniguez“Although post-judgment motions to intervene are generally disfavored, post-judgment intervention for purposes of appeal may be appropriate if certain requirements are met, the first of which is that the intervenors must act promptly after entry of judgment_• The second requirement is that the intervenors must meet traditional standing criteria.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.