Armstrong v. Armstrong’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
October 2005
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Relies on Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams · Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. Pope · In re Disbarment of Gonzales · Yamamoto v. United States · Davis Oil Co. v. Mills
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.