Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 130 FSUPP2D 157 - Cohesive Technologies v. Waters Corp.

Cohesive Technologies v. Waters Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
October 2014
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 103

Relies on Paragon Podiatry Laboratory, Inc. v. KLM Laboratories, Inc. · Atd Corporation v. Lydall, Inc., Defendant/cross-Appellant · Gambro Lundia AB v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.