¶1The evidence being conflicting as to whether the plaintiff left her husband’s home and lived apart from him because of cruel treatment, or voluntarily quitted him in unprovoked anger, without excuse and because she did not wish to live longer with him, the court below did not abuse its discretion in declining to grant her prayer for temporary alimony, together with counsel fees. Pearson v. Pearson, 125 Ga. 132 (54 S. E. 194). Judgment affirmed.
130 Ga. 608
George v. George
Decided May 13, 1908
Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1908-05-13
<p>Petition for alimonjr. Before Judge Wright. Floyd superior court. October 11, 1907.</p>
Relies on Pearson v. Pearson
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1908-05-13
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 1967
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →