Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 130 Idaho 105 - Kessler v. Tortoise Development, Inc.

Kessler v. Tortoise Development, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
November 2011
most recently cited

1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 2011

1 district · 5 state decisions

30199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bondy v. Levy · Doyle v. Ortega · Haessly v. Safeco Title Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[O]ur reading of the default provision, the earnest money provision, and the title insurance provision leads us to the conclusion that the purchase agreement is reasonably subject to at least three reasonable and conflicting interpretations concerning the remedy that is available to Kessler in the circumstances presented here---- Because the purchase agreement is ambiguous, its interpretation presents a question fact concerning which of the three provisions controls.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “19. TITLE INSURANCE.... It is agreed that if the title of said premises is not marketable, or cannot be made so within thirty (30) days after notice containing a written statement of defects is delivered to the Seller or if the Seller, having approved said sale fails to consummate the same as herein agreed, the earnest money shall be returned to the Buyer and Seller shall pay for the cost of title insurance, escrow and legal fees if any.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.