130 Ill. App. 3d 385 - People v. Mueller’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 2023
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 66 Ill. 2d 551 - People v. King · Greene v. Massey · 91 Ill. 2d 346 - People v. Dixon · 85 Ill. 2d 281 - People of Illinois v. Myers · 77 Ill. App. 3d 413 - People v. Mahon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(b) A prosecution is barred if the defendant was formerly prosecuted for a different offense, or for the same offense based upon different facts, if such former prosecution: (1) Resulted in either a conviction or an acquittal, and the subsequent prosecution is for an offense of which the defendant could have been convicted on the former prosecution; or was for an offense with which the defendant should have been charged on the former prosecution, as provided in Section 3 — 3 of this Code (unless the court ordered a separate trial of such charge); or was for an offense which involves the same conduct, unless each prosecution requires proof of a fact not required on the other prosecution, or the offense was not consummated when the former trial began; ***.” (Emphasis added.) Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 38, par. 3— 4(b)(1).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““The Scott County State’s Attorney could not have properly instituted charges against defendant for the offenses of concealment committed in Cass County. [Citation.] Since defendant could not have been properly charged with this offense, he could not have been convicted of it in the prior prosecution for murder.” Mueller, 130 Ill. App. 3d at 389 , 474 N.E.2d at 437 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.