Almquist v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1930
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 1992
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Board of County Commissioners v. Woodward · Milbourne v. Kelley · Bank Savings Life Insurance v. Baker · Serrault v. Price · Keith v. Keith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““That the legislature has the right and power to increase or reduce the time for filing claims and to lengthen or shorten the period of limitation statutes is not a debatable question in Kansas, as such changes have been held to affect the remedy only and not to impair rights or obligations. (Citations.)” (p. 418.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Conrad v. Johnson““All claims of depositors and other creditors must be filed with the receiver within one year after the date of his appointment, and if not so filed such claims shall be barred from participation in the estate of such bank.” (R. S. 1930 Supp. 9-130.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Conrad v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.