Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 130 LA 285 - Moss v. Drost

Moss v. Drost’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
April 1978
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently April 1978

13 state decisions

401912192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 18 La. Ann. 497 - Lanfear v. Mestier · 3 La. Ann. 640 - Oglesby v. Drake

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * It [the judgment] cannot be assailed successfully, unless it be alleged in what respect there was fraud and ill practice. The presumption is that the judgment was regularly obtained. To overcome that presumption, the particular acts of fraud and ill practice, should have been alleged."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.