Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

130 Mass. 113

Davis v. Smith

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 8, 1881

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1881-01-08

Tort against the sheriff of the county of Dukes County for the act of Jason L. Dexter, his deputy, in entering the plaintiff’s close in Edgartown and tearing down and removing a fence standing thereon. At the trial in the Superior Court, before Allen, J., without a jury, the plaintiffs offered to prove that the title of the locus where the alleged trespass was committed was in them; and that said locus was not within a town way or private way.

Relies on Denham v. County Commissioners · Marshall v. Hosmer

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1881-01-08

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 1979

7 state decisions

301881189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Gray, O. J.

¶1Town ways and private ways laid out under the provisions of our statutes are public ways. Denham v. County Commissioners, 108 Mass. 202. The power conferred upon justices of the peace by the Gen. Sts. c. 46, § 5, to order fences, gates, rails or bars across town ways or private ways to be removed, is no more a judicial power than if it had been vested in the selectmen or in the surveyors of highways, or than is the similar power which any citizen has, under § 4 of the same statute, to remove like obstructions in a county highway. Not being a judicial power, an order of a justice of the peace for the removal of such an obstruction is not in the nature of a judicial warrant, precept or process; the sheriff or his deputy is not required in his official capacity to serve it; and any acts done by the deputy in the execution of such an order are not done by virtue or under color of his office, but are his personal acts, for which the sheriff is not responsible. Gen. Sts. c. 17, §§ 15, 65; c. 122,, § 5. Marshall v. Hosmer, 4 Mass. 60. Knowlton v. Bartlett, 1 Pick. 271. Mansfield v. Sumner, 6 Met. 94. Whether the deputy himself would be liable to an action, upon the facts z stated in the bill of exceptions, cannot be decided in this case, to which he is not a party.

¶2Exceptions overruled.

/130/mass/113 · .json · Public domain