Sampson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2001
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · Rakas v. Illinois · Boyd v. United States · Oliver v. United States · Hester v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A single bag of trash testifies eloquently to the eating, reading, and recreational habits of the person who produced it. A search of trash, like a search of the bedroom, can relate intimate details about sexual practices, health, and personal hygiene. Like rifling through desk drawers or intercepting phone calls, rummaging through trash can divulge the target's financial and professional status, political affiliations and inclinations, private thoughts, personal relationships and romantic interests. It cannot be doubted that a sealed trash bag harbors telling evidence of the "intimate activity associated with the `sanctity of a man's home and privacies of life...."'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sampson“Although a resident who places a trash bag out for collection has no Fourth Amendment protection against the trash collector picking up the bag and turning it over to the police, the Fourth Amendment does prohibit a law enforcement officer from making a warrantless seizure of a trash bag located within the curtilage of the residence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sampson“the warrantless `trash runs' at issue in this case violated appellant's Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable governmental intrusion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sampson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.