Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

130 Misc. 394

Zimmerman v. Rubin

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · decided 1927-06-29

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1927-06-29

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 1991

6 state decisions

3019271930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1This is an action to recover broker’s commissions on the sale of a store. The broker, who is the plaintiff, appellant, brought the parties together, and the purchaser agreed to the seller’s terms. Because of two misrepresentations made by the seller, the purchaser has been allowed to recover back the deposit which he made. The plaintiff, appellant, was not responsible for the non-completion of the transaction. Having brought a customer who was able, ready and willing to purchase on the seller s terms, he has earned and is entitled to the commission for which he sued.

¶2Judgment reversed, with $30 costs to appellant, and judgment directed for plaintiff for $650 and costs.

¶3All concur; present, Bi,tur, Levy and Crain, JJ.

/130/misc/394 · .json · Public domain