Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

130 Misc. 716

Wasylenko v. Frysky

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1927

New York Supreme Court · decided 1927-10-08

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 1936

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1927-10-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Lynch, J.

¶1This is a motion under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice for judgment on the pleadings. The plaintiff has instituted an action to recover damages for slander.

¶2An examination of the complaint discloses that the only alleged slanderous words charged against the defendant are that he informed the public officials that the plaintiff had violated the provisions of the National Prohibition Act (41 U. S. Stat. at Large, 305; U. S. Code, tit. 27). It is difficult to conceive how under any circumstances such words could be construed as slanderous. If it be true that the society in question illegally had liquor, it was the duty of the citizens to inform the government of that fact and thus prevent the violation of our laws. If the defendant gave this information, he was doing nothing more than what a good citizen should have done under like circumstances. The law certainly will not hold words slanderous if it charges the person with the performance of a lawful duty.

¶3The defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings will be granted.

/130/misc/716 · .json · Public domain