Poblet v. Parisi’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 1993
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is not clear to this court that the statute as originally enacted was ever intended to include an exclusively psychiatric and/or psychological injury within the definition of "serious injury." Accordingly, the court is reluctant to construe the amended statute as providing two additional categories in which a plaintiff's claim for non-permanent psychiatric and/or psychological injury might fall.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“an alleged psychiatric and/or psychological disorder should at least meet the requirements of the second”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“medically determined injury or impairment of a non permanent nature.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.