Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 130 MO 358 - State v. Crosswhite

State v. Crosswhite’s Empirical Analysis

1895

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
7
states following
February 1954
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 1954

19 state decisions

801895190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Adams · State v. Dodson · Bourg v. Lopez · State v. Grisham · Furlow v. Gillian

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The embezzlement of the potatoes and the proceeds arising from them were two separate and distinct offenses, and evidence in proof of one was not permissible for the purpose of proving the other.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If any carrier, bailee or other person shall embezzle * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “in the language of the statute, and unquestionably good.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.