Taylor v. Sartorious’s Empirical Analysis
1908
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 43 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently September 1965 · most notably Bruszewski v. United States (1950), Coca Cola Co. v. Pepsi-Cola Co. (1934)
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 43 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kelly v. Thuey · Womach v. City of St. Joseph · Edwards v. . Dooley · Capital Bank v. Armstrong · Strough v. Gear
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`The question of who is concluded by a judgment has been obscured by the use of the words”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.