Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 130 N.C. App. 670 - Pinckney v. Baker

130 N.C. App. 670 - Pinckney v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co. · Ingle v. . Cassady · Swaim v. Simpson · Bolick v. SUNBIRD AIRLINES INC. · 96 N.C. App. 443 - Bolick v. Sunbird Airlines, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “According to Baker, the alleged emergency circumstance . . . was the action of Luces in pulling suddenly and unexpectedly in front of Baker’s van. However, Baker repeatedly testified he did not see Luces’ vehicle prior to the collision, and that his attention was directed to it only upon impact.... [T]he sole indication in the record is that Baker was unaware of the alleged emergency until the actual collision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the jury is permitted to consider, in its determination of whether specific conduct was reasonable under the circumstances, that the actor faced an emergency. It logically follows that in order for perception of an emergency to have affected the reasonableness of the actor's conduct, the [actor] must have perceived the emergency circumstance and reacted to it .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.