Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 130 N.C. App. 751 - West v. Marko

130 N.C. App. 751 - West v. Marko’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently February 2017 · most notably In Re LL (2005), 172 N.C. App. 689 - In re L.L. (2005)

40 state decisions

190199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pulliam v. Smith · 126 N.C. App. 800 - Abels v. Renfro Corp. · Maximus v. LOCKHEED INFO. MGMT. SYSTEMS · 100 N.C. App. 723 - Searles v. Searles · 75 N.C. App. 260 - State Employees' Credit Union, Inc. v. Gentry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`an order rendered in open court is not enforceable until it is”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a judgment is entered when it is reduced to writing, signed by the judge, and filed with the clerk of court.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[a]n announcement of judgment in open court constitutes the rendition of judgment, not its entry.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.