130 N.J. Super. 119 - State v. Pollara’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 1976
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * Availability of the proceedings is dependent on the court determining “in its discretion” either that (1) defendant’s presence in the community or in a civil treatment center or program will not pose a danger to the community, or (2) the terms and conditions of supervisory treatment will be adequate to protect the public and will benefit defendant by serving to correct any dependence on or use of controlled substances which he may manifest. N. J. S. A. 24:21-27, subd. c.’ ” (quoting from State v. Pollara, 130 N. J. Super. 119, 121 (App. Div. 1974)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Sayko
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.