Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 130 NJSUPER 322 - State v. Interpace Corp.

State v. Interpace Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
July 2013
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently July 2013

22 state decisions

9019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dolson v. Anastasia · STATE, HIGHWAY COMM'R v. Gorga · Village of Ridgewood v. Sreel Investment Corp. · 59 N.J. Super. 583 - Mueller v. NJ Highway Authority · Jersey City Redevelopment Agency v. Kugler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “General benefits are those produced by the improvement which a property owner may enjoy in the future in common with all other property owners in the area. The question of benefits usually arises when a statutory right to set off for benefits exists. See Ridgewood v. Sreel Investment Corp., above, 28 N.J. at 131 [ 145 A.2d 306 ]; 3 Nichols on Eminent Domain, § 8.62. General benefits may not be considered to reduce the compensation. The applicable rule in the ordinary condemnation case is that the proper basis of compensation is the value of the property as it would be at the time of the taking disregarding depreciation or inflation attributable to the proposed improvement. [State Com’r of Transp. v. Interpace Corp., supra, 130 N.J.Super. at 330-31, 327 A.2d 225 .]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.