State v. Marquez’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
50 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently March 2021 · most notably State v. Urban (2004), State v. Plouse (2003)
50 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Doggett v. United States · Klopfer v. State of North Carolina · Smith v. Hooey · United States v. MacDonald
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e must bear in mind that (1) the four Barker factors are interrelated and must be evaluated in light of the particular circumstances of the case and (2) we should compare the conduct of the State and Defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Maddox“When the state has delayed long past the time considered presumptively prejudicial, its burden to show on the record that defendant's right to a speedy trial was not violated becomes correspondingly heavier.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Maddox“[T]he delay that can be tolerated for an ordinary street crime is considerably less than for a serious, complex conspiracy charge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Stock
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.