State v. Shaneace L.’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
March 2022
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Rowell · State v. Freed · State v. Laguna · Matter of Ernesto M., Jr. · State v. Pisio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“testimony that Child threatened to kill [the victim] and her baby shortly after the placing of the telephone call is sufficient evidence from which the children's court could infer that Child had the intent to annoy or harass [the victim].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Trossman“[t]he use of obscene, lewd or profane language or the making of a threat or statement . . . shall be prima facie evidence of intent to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, annoy or offend.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Trossman“Use of telephone to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, annoy or offend”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Trossman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.