130 Ohio App. 3d 247
719 N.E.2d 1042
Decided October 21, 1998
Ohio Court of Appeals · decided 1998-10-21
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1998-10-21
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 2024
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 concurring in judgment only.
¶2 I concur in judgment only since I feel the trial court reasonably should have known of trial counsel’s possible conflict of interest. However, since trial counsel’s representation was not affected by an actual conflict of interest, remand to the trial court for inquiry as to whether an actual conflict exists, as required by Ingot, would serve no purpose.