Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 130 OHIOAPP3D 467 - State v. Coffman

State v. Coffman’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 2023

7 state decisions

501998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Young · State v. Smith · State v. Phillips · State v. Boston · State v. White

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “this inquiry is guided by four factors: (1) the nature of the remarks, (2) whether an objection was made by counsel, (3) whether corrective instructions were given by the court, and (4) the strength of evidence against the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “mindful of the general maxim that prosecutorial misconduct is not grounds for reversal unless it so taints the proceedings that it deprives the defendant of a fair trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.