Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 130 Okla. 7 - Bartels v. Suter

Bartels v. Suter’s Empirical Analysis

1928

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
October 1935
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on First Nat. Bank v. Boxley · Marling v. Jones · Barnes v. Universal Tire Protector Co. · Mersick v. Alderman · Chester v. . Dorr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the hands of any holder other than a holder in due course, a negotiable instrument is subject to the same defenses as if it were nonnegotiable. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.