Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 130 SO3D 184 - Hicks v. Hicks

Hicks v. Hicks’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Property at 2018 Rainbow Drive · 989 So. 2d 556 - Vann v. Cook · 807 So. 2d 534 - Ex Parte Carter · De-Gas, Inc. v. Midland Resources · Espinoza v. Rudolph

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The failure to pay the filing or docketing fee is a jurisdictional defect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Thompson v. Thompson (Ex parte Thompson)
  2. “'Section 12-19-70, Ala. Code 1975, provides that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Thompson v. Thompson (Ex parte Thompson)
  3. “[a] verified statement of substantial hardship”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Thompson v. Thompson (Ex parte Thompson)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.