Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

130 So. 3d 194

Hicks v. Hicks

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 31, 2013

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 2013-05-31

Relies on Horsley v. Horsley

Decided 2013-05-31

PER CURIAM.

¶1The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

¶2In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

¶3WRIT DENIED.

STUART, BOLIN, PARKER, MURDOCK, MAIN, and WISE, JJ., concur.SHAW, J., concurs specially.*195MOORE, C.J., dissents.BRYAN, J., recuses himself.*
/130/so3d/194 · .json · Public domain