Crews v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2015
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 991 So. 2d 803 - Kasischke v. State · 823 So. 2d 740 - State v. Byars · Hallberg v. State · 984 So. 2d 548 - LaMorte v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We do not know whether the legislature meant to use the phrase in a broad sense to refer to any government employee, or in a narrow sense to include only those employees who hold an “office” as defined in the state constitution or the state laws. The narrow construction makes more sense to me as I do not think; there is any valid reason to treat public employees differently from private employees. At the very least, the statute is ambiguous, and I would resolve the ambiguity in favor of the defendant pursuant to the rule of lenity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.