Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 130 S.W.2d 1081 - Jaye v. Wheat

Jaye v. Wheat’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 2017

7 state decisions

20193919401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. First National Bank of El Paso · New Nueces Hotel Co. v. Sorenson · New Nueces Hotel Co. v. Sorenson · Gaston v. Boyd · Stanfield v. Neill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a claim for money against an estate has been rejected by the executor or administrator, either in whole or in part, the owner of such claim may, within ninety days after such rejection, and not thereafter, bring suit against the executor or administrator for the establishment thereof in any court having jurisdiction of the same.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The ninety days is not a statute of limitation in the usual sense, but constitutes a qualification upon the right to maintain the action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.