State v. Hudson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

13 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[W]here a long and unnecessary delay occurs in bringing a defendant who is amenable to process before the court, CrR 3.3's 90-day trial period is deemed to commence at the time the information was filed....”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Huffmeyer · State v. King

2. “Additionally, any delay caused by the defendant's fault or connivance is also excluded from the time for trial calculation.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Chenoweth · State v. Anderson

3. “Striker, 87 Wash.2d at 871-72 , 557 P.2d 847 . Although Striker was decided under an older version of CrR 3.3, we held in State v. Greenwood, 120 Wash.2d 585, 593 , 845 P.2d 971 (1993), that the Striker rule is still necessary under the current version of the rule because the amended rule still does not set a time period between charging and bringing the defendant before the court. In Greenwood , we reaffirmed the Striker rule that CrR 3.3 could be violated if a long [4] and”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Hudson