State v. Carlson’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 2005
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Arvizu · 51 Wash. App. 775 - State v. Anderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the identified citizen informant gave an extensive and detailed recitation of facts upon which he based his conclusion that the two individuals he observed were purchasing chemicals for the production of methamphetamine.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Carlson“due to his experience and training that the items purchased were those commonly used as precursors for the production of methamphetamine.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Carlson“conclusion that [Mr. Owens and Mr. Carlson] were purchasing precursors for the production of methamphetamine.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Carlson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.